Bourgeoisie journalists and Proletarian Politicians!
Three incidents. Casting a shadow
over the future of credibility of Indian Media first took place in Parliament
Campus on 19th September of this year, where TMC(Treenmul Congress)
leader Saugata Roy flabbergasted an anchor of a National News Channel by saying
that she is raising question like a representative of Government of India, on
the issue of FDI in retail sector, instead of the News channel, she is
associated with. Second, on 4th October of this year, when Left
Party leader Atul Anjan quitted a debate on FDI in Retail sector amid
discussion on ABP News at about 6 O’clock in the evening. The lady anchor
seemed to have too much excited for having streao type remark as “we oppose FDI
in retail” by Atul Anjan as she got from BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqbi, shared
the panel. But Atul was trying to focus this issue in depth that was objected
by Anchor and finally Atul prefer to quit panel to follow formality of opposing
FDI in retail as BJP spokesperson. Last but not least, when leader of
opposition in Loksabha Mrs Sushma Swaraj twitted that Media is
manipulating her word on the issue of PM
Resignation on Coal-Gate! According to twit, Sushma countered Mainstream Media
by saying she has never compromised with her demand, on behalf of BJP, on PM
resignation on Coal-Gate but Media is putting words. No need to say we have
enough example rest to portray Main Stream Media as a reverse character bearer
to “Fourth Pillar of Democracy” but let’s have three latest examples first.
According
to Noam Chomsky, when there is little or no elite dissent from a government
policy, there may still be some slippage in the mass media, and facts that tend
to undermine the government line, if they are properly understood, can be
found, usually on the back pages of the newspaper. It would have been very
difficult for the Guatemalan government to murder tens of thousands over the
past decade if the U.S.
press had provided the kind of coverage they gave to the difficulties of Andrei
Sakharov or the murder of Jerzy Popieluczko in Poland . It would have been
impossible to wage a brutal war against South Vietnam and the rest of
Indochina, leaving a legacy of misery and destruction that many never be overcome,
if the media had not rallied to the cause, portraying murderous aggression as a
defense of freedom, and only opening the doors to tactical disagreement when
the costs to the interests they represent became too high.
Corporate
nexus with Indian Media was broadly exposed in November, 2010 as renowned English Magazine
OPEN carried a story which reported transcripts of some of the telephone
conversations of Corporate Lobbyist Nira Radia with senior journalist,
politicians and corporate houses, many of whom denied the allegations after a
few days but smell still on. In spite of similar character of Indian Media and
Western Media due to Globalization, no similarity between political status of
both part of the world as in America, Media can assure Obama’s win but in India
in spite of full coverage of Rahul Gandhi, people can defeat Congress in UP
Assembly election and even after getting least coverage in Media, Mayawati can
rule Uttar Pradesh until her term permit. Although “Radia episode” of Indian
Media drawn attention worldwide in spite of the extreme endeavour of a “Class”
to not let them public. Interestingly, none of any political parties have
raised their voice in favour or in against to these conversation. Both national
parties BJP and INC kept mum, moreover other regional parties have not been
sought any strong or even cocophony debate on this “news”. But, after almost
two years “buried material” seem to have reincarnationed as of incidents of
targeting media increased during last few months.
“You seem to be a representative of
Government…even you have better source and information than we have!”, Saugata
Roy, who has just kicked his post of Minister of State for Urban Development of
India as TMC walked out from UPA. Saugata Rai is a veteran politician of
Trinmool Congress and even is known for his academic prosperity. During a walk
in Parliament Campus, he was heckled by a lady journalist of a National English
News Channel on the issue of FDI in retail sector. Roy was extremely surprised
and seemed to have disappointed as he was informed by the journalist, during
conversation, that TMC has option whether he permit or not permit FDI in retail
in his ruled state West Bengal. Roy
countered him by saying her question in totally fatuous and she should learn
before asking these lunatic question. After that Roy taught her about WTO’s agreement and
guidelines, that will probably compel all state of permit RTI in retail if one
state does so. Almost all questions of the journalist seemed to have dispersed!
Doubtlessly saying, Its Indian Mainstream
Media, who has been facing a question of credibility in public domain after
even after two years of “Radia-Gate”. Its well known to intellectuals that
Media is lobbying in the favour of FDI in retail and also a big class of Media
is trying to confuse apple man to the real root of corruption, i.e Open Market
Economy, but Media should not ignore that Indian people can dare to think
beyond BJP and INC. Kudos to TMC leader Saugata Roy and Left leader Atul Anjan
for vindicating this fact.
No comments:
Post a Comment